Comments on: Is Economy as a science solid enough to define what’s true and what’s not? http://scarcityrent.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/ Digressive thoughts from an engineer & economist going for an MBA ;) Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:15:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: The darker side of economics (how well intended theories can get the worst of MBAs) « Gabriel’s scarcity rent - it’s management stupid! http://scarcityrent.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-1305 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:55:58 +0000 http://gabrielbcn.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-1305 [...] business is a social science. (Remember the reflection I made, long ago, about Economy as a Science?) Well, sciences must be held with care. Sciences must be thoroughly studied, interpreted and [...]

]]> By: Economy: art or science? « Gabriel’s scarcity rent http://scarcityrent.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-487 Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:36:24 +0000 http://gabrielbcn.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-487 [...] to lead us to the truth, whatever that might be. I thought about it in the previous post “Is Economy as a science solid enough to define what’s true and what’s not?“, and end up talking about the Lucas [...]

]]> By: Logit models in Econometrics and bit entropy: there's something going on here « Gabriel’s scarcity rent http://scarcityrent.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-427 Tue, 29 May 2007 09:20:26 +0000 http://gabrielbcn.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/is-economy-solid-enough-to-define-whats-true-and-whats-not-true/#comment-427 [...] it wasn’t. What kind of science could have his rules changed by politicians? I posted my negative opinion here: Economy did not have solid enough foundations to say what was true or [...]

]]>